Tashman v. Saul

District Court, S.D. New York

Tashman v. Saul

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOSEPHALEXTASHMAN, Plaintiff, 21 CIVIL 801 (IMF)\(GRJ) -against- JUDGMENT KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Defendant. wenn K

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated August 8, 2022, the R&R is ADOPTED in its entirety. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED; and the Commissioner's cross- motion is GRANTED. The Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York August 11, 2022 RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerkof Court BY: K Ma NGO Deputy Clerk

Reference

Status
Unknown