Rushing v. Municipal Credit Union
Rushing v. Municipal Credit Union
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SHAUN AKINDO ALEXANDER RUSHING, Plaintiff, 22-CV-7413 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651MUNICIPAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On January 3, 2022, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in this court in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Rushing v. Extra Space Storage, ECF 1:21-CV-9113, 5 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 3, 2022). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the court. The Court therefore dismisses the action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the January 3, 2022, order. The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 1, 2022 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown