UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SAMUEL ARTHUR SABET, Plaintiff, 22-CV-7842 (ALC) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL S.D.N.Y.; CHIEF JUDGE LAURA TAYLOR UNDER

SWAIN, Defendants. ANDREW L. CARTER, United States District Judge: On January 31, 2008, the court barred Plaintiff from filing any new civil actions in forma pauperis (IFP) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See S.A. Godowner v. Footlocker, Inc., ECF 1:07-CV-11042, 6 (KMW) (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 31, 2008), appeal dismissed, No. 08-1068-cv (2d Cir. May 29, 2008) (holding that the appeal “lack[ed] an arguable basis in law or fact.”).! Plaintiff files this new pro se action and seeks IFP status, but has not sought leave from the court to file. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for failure to comply with the January 31, 2008, order. The Court certifies, pursuant to

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 14, 2022 / (re New York, New York [Ayrdbee d).—~. ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge

'In S.A. Godowner, No. 07-CV-11042, Plaintiff sued Footlocker, Inc., under the name “S.A. Godowner.” Plaintiff previously sued Footlocker, Inc. under the names Sabet and Godowner. See Sabet v. Doe, Owner of Wordmark “Footlocker Inc.,” No. 07-CV-5882 (DAB) (S.D.N-Y. June 21, 2007) (dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted); Godowner v. Footlocker, Inc., No. 08-CV-0338 (KMW) (S.D.N-Y. Jan 15, 2008) (voluntarily withdrawn).