Farley v. Diferro Contracting Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Farley v. Diferro Contracting Corp.

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARLENA FARLEY, Plaintiff, Vv. 22-CV-0821 (RA) DIFERRO CONTRACTING CORP., ICONIC ORDER MECHANICAL SERVICES CORP., and CHRISTIAN BEZMALINOVIC, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled. Accordingly, it is hereby: ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within 30 days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same 30-day period. See Hendrickson vy. United States,

791 F.3d 354, 358

(2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 19, 2022 qe, New York, New York fk. fo LT —_—_. Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown