District Court, S.D. New York, 2022

Gilliam v. Discover Bank

Gilliam v. Discover Bank
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided October 6, 2022
Gilliam v. Discover Bank

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX JAMES W. GILLIAM et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 22-CV-7513 (JMF) -v- : : ORDER DISCOVER BANK et al., : Defendants. : wee KX JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: Plaintiff James W. Gilliam, proceeding without counsel, moves on behalf of himself and Co-Plaintiff Laura A. Gilliam for judicial notice of certain materials. See ECF No. 8.

Although Mr. Gilliam purports to represent both himself and Ms. Gilliam, he is authorized to represent only himself as he is admittedly not a member of the Bar of this Court.

See, e.g., lannaccone v. Law, 142 F.3d 553, 558 (2d Cir. 1998) (“[B]ecause pro se means to appear for one’s self, a person may not appear on another person’s behalf in the other’s cause.”’).

Accordingly, as to Ms. Gilliam, the motion for judicial notice is DENIED as procedurally improper.

As to Mr. Gilliam, the motion is premature and thus DENIED without prejudice to renewal if, or when, it would be appropriate for the Court to take judicial notice of materials in this case.

For avoidance of doubt, the Court notes that Mr. Gilliam’s request for permission to use electronic case filing is effective only as to him. Thus, unless and until the Court orders otherwise, Ms. Gilliam must file any papers by mailing or delivering them to the Pro Se Intake Unit and Defendants must continue to serve hard copies of any filings on Ms. Gilliam.

The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 8 and mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiffs.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: October 6, 2022 New York, New York ESSE RMAN nited States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.