Mouazeb v. Fargesen
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK EMILIO HABIB MOUAZEB, Plaintiff, 21-CV-9226 (JPO) -v- VITALY FARGESEN, et al, Defendants.
STANDMILL S.R.O, Plaintiff, 22-CV-1537 (JPO) -v- VITALY FARGESEN, et al, ORDER Defendants.
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The motion to consolidate these cases is hereby granted. All future filings relating to either case shall be filed in the lead case, 21-CV-9226. All counsel in 22-CV-1537 shall file appearances in 21-CV-9226 within 7 days. Despite such consolidation, the consolidated cases “retain their separate identities,” Hall v. Hall, 138 S. Ct. 1118, 1128-31 (2018), and this order does not affect the rights of the parties in either of the consolidated cases.
The scheduling order entered on June 28, 2022, in 21-CV-9226 shall govern both consolidated cases.
For administrative purposes, the Clerk of Court is directed to close 22-CV-1537. The Clerk is also directed to close the motion at Docket Number 827 in 21-CV-9226.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 13, 2022 New York, New York | J. PAUL OETKEN United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.