Quezada v. Beam Suntory Inc.
Quezada v. Beam Suntory Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UsDC SUNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED:_10/27/2022 JOSE QUEZADA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 1:22-ev-04521-MKV “against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL BEAM SUNTORY INC., Defendant.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 15]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by November 28, 2022. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,
356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED. | i / . Date: October 27, 20212 MARY av visfoc) New York, NY United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown