Barnes v. Metro Franchising Commissary LLC
Barnes v. Metro Franchising Commissary LLC
Trial Court Opinion
GreenbergTraurig
Jerroid Goldberg Tel 212.801.9209 Fax 212.801.6400 [email protected] November 8, 2022 VIA ECF The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer United States District Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 2201 New York, NY 10007 Re: Barnes v. Metro Franchising Commissary LLC (1:22-cv-05178) (PAE) (BCM) Joint Letter Regarding Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Dear Judge Engelmayer: We represent Defendant Metro Franchising Commissary LLC (“Defendant Metro”) in the above-referenced matter. On behalf of Defendant Metro and Plaintiffs Thomas Barnes and Khaliq Johnson (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) (Plaintiffs and Defendant Metro collectively the “Parties”), we submit this letter in response to the Court’s November 4, 2022 Order regarding Plaintiffs’ notice of voluntary dismissal of this action without prejudice. The Parties maintain that Plaintiffs’ voluntary dismissal of their claims without prejudice is not part of a settlement that requires judicial review because the Parties have not reached an agreement regarding Plaintiffs’ Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) claims. Plaintiffs are not releasing any FLSA claims or waiving any FLSA rights in connection with the dismissal of this action. See Samake v. Thunder Lube, Inc., 24 F 4th 804, 810 (2d Cir, 2022) (explaining “district courts [a]re required to review the fairness of a settlement waiving FLSA rights” before giving effect to dismissal of such claims) (emphasis added). To the contrary, Plaintiffs are retaining their rights to pursue FLSA claims against Defendant Metro and Defendant Glen Wayne (collectively, “Defendants” in the future. Under these circumstances, in the absence of any payment, promise, or other benefit offered by Defendants in exchange for a release of FLSA claims or a waiver of FLSA rights, the Parties believe Plaintiffs’ filing of a notice of dismissal without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Cry. P. 4} (a)(1)(A)(1) requires the dismissal of this action. Accordingly, the Parties request this Court permit Plaintiffs’ notice of dismissal without prejudice. See id. at 810.
Greenberg Traurig, LLP | Attorneys at Law One Vanderbilt Avenue | New York, New York 10017 [ T +1 212.801.9200 | F +4.212.801.6400 Albany. Amsterdam. Atlanta. Austin, Berlin: Boston, Chicago, Dallas. Delaware. Denver. Fort Lauderdale. Houston. Las Vegas. London: Los Angeles. Mexico City! Miami, Milan: Minneapolis, New Jersey, New York, Northern Virginia. Orange County. Orlando. Phitadeiphia. Phoenix. Sacramento. Salt Lake City. San Francisco. Seoul. Shanghai. Silicon Valley. Tallahassee. Tampa, Tel Aviv; Tokyo! Warsaw. Washington, D.C. West Palm Beach. Westchester County. Germary, CUP, "A Separate UK rea stéred legal extity: *@raepbag Traulg, $.0.. *"Greerbetg Teaarig Sarda Maria, “Giesebeg Trung LLP Foregn Legal Coreutant Office, “A branch of Greenberg Treama PA. Flange, USA, SGT Tokyo Honiru Jrmanho and Grasnbarg □□□□□□ “Greens Trae Nowaktasha- Zion Wysierell uk 2 a : ACTIVE 683214534y2 wea. □□□□□□□□
The Honorable Paul A. Engelmayer November 8, 2022 Page 2 We thank the Court for its attention to this matter. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jerrold Goldberg Jerrold Goldberg Shareholder cc: Joshua Levin-Epstein, Esq. (via ECF) Jason Mizrahi, Esq. (vid ECF)
The Court, having been assured that the parties' stipulated voluntary dismissal at docket 18 does not involve the dismissal of plaintiff's FLSA claims in exchange for any promise, payment, or other benefit from the defendant requiring review under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.,
796 F.3d 199(2d Cir. 2015), directs the Clerk of the Court to approve the voluntary dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 and to close this case. SO ORDERED.
Paul A Eng omy/ PAUL A. ENGELMAYER @ United States District Judge November 10, 2022
Greenberg Traurig, LLF | Attorneys at Law“ ACTIVE 6832748342 www. □□□□□□□□□
Reference
- Status
- Unknown