Hager-Reilly v. SCO Family of Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHERYL HAGER-REILLY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 21 Civ. 11023 (JGK) (SLC) ORDER SCO FAMILY OF SERVICES, Defendant.

SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.

The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff's letter-motion requesting a stay of outstanding discovery deadlines. (ECF No. 71 (the “Motion to Stay”)). The principal prerequisite for issuance of a stay is “‘probable irreparable harm[.]’” 29 Brooklyn, LLC v. Chesley, No. 15 Civ. 5180 (ARR), 2015 WL 9255549, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 16, 2015) (quoting In re Adelphia Commce’ns Corp., 361 B.R. 337, 347 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)). Because Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate probable irreparable harm, the Motion to Stay is DENIED.

To the extent an issue arises during depositions, the parties are reminded that they may contact Chambers in accordance with the Court’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases.+ The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 71.

Dated: New York, New York SO ORDERED.

November 14, 2022 ay i /) A WAZ eee L. CAYE ' See Individual Practices in Civil Cases, nited States Magistrate Judge https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/practice_ documents/SLC%20Individual%20Practices%20in %20Civil%20Cases%20%E2%80%93%20September%2030th%2C%202022.pdf (last visited Nov. 11, 2022).