Aniseto v. Just Another Deli, Inc.
Aniseto v. Just Another Deli, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------- x : JUAN FELICIANO ANSIETO, : Plaintiff, : : -against- : 1:20-cv-7991 (ALC)(SDA) : ORDER HAK S. MEIER and AQIDAS TRADING, : INC. d/b/a Q MARQET, : : Defendant. --------------------------------------------------------- x ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of the parties’ letter motion for settlement approval filed July 15, 2022. (ECF No. 63.) Having reviewed the settlement agreement as required by Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.,
796 F.3d 199(2d Cir. 2015), the Court finds it to be fair and reasonable, and approves the settlement. In reaching this conclusion, the Court has considered, inter alia, that (1)the settlement amount provides Plaintiff with a recovery that is fair in light of the identified litigation risks, and is within the possible range of recovery; (2) the attorney’s fees portion of the settlement is reasonable; and (3) the agreement does not impose a duty of confidentiality. See Fisher v. SD Prot. Inc.,
948 F.3d 593, 600(2d Cir. 2020); see also Brittle v. Metamorphosis, LLC, No. 20 CIV. 3880 (ER),
2021 WL 606244, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2021). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the above-captioned case be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety without fees or costs except as agreed to by the parties. SO ORDERED. Dated: December 12, 2022 New York, New York (Avda 7 C2 ANDREW L. CARTER, JR. United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown