Fox v. Kijakazi

District Court, N.D. New York

Fox v. Kijakazi

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

LEE F.,

Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:20-CV-1272 (DEP)

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,1

Defendant.

APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL:

FOR PLAINTIFF

LACHMAN, GORTON LAW FIRM PETER A. GORTON, ESQ. P.O. Box 89 1500 East Main Street Endicott, NY 13761-0089

FOR DEFENDANT

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN. NATASHA OELTJEN, ESQ. Office of the General Counsel 6401 Security Boulevard Baltimore, MD 21235

1 Plaintiff’s complaint named Andrew M. Saul, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of Social Security, as the defendant. On July 12, 2021, Kilolo Kijakazi took office as the Acting Social Security Commissioner. She has therefore been substituted as the named defendant in this matter pursuant to Rule 25(d)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and no further action is required in order to effectuate this change. See

42 U.S.C. § 405

(g). DAVID E. PEEBLES U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DECISION AND ORDER2

Plaintiff commenced this action, pursuant to

42 U.S.C. §§ 405

(g) and 1383(c)(3), to challenge a denial by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for Social Security disability benefits. On March 24, 2022, this court ordered that the Commissioner’s decision be affirmed and plaintiff’s complaint be dismissed, and judgment was entered accordingly. Following an appeal from the judgment, a panel of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated this court’s judgment and returned the matter to this court with an instruction to remand the matter to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings. Fox v. Kijakazi,

22-793,

2023 WL 124861

(2d Cir. Jan. 4, 2023). Based upon that court’s determination, it is hereby ORDERED that the judgment of this court (Dkt. No. 25) is VACATED, and the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further

proceedings; and it is further respectfully ORDERED that the clerk enter judgment consistent with this opinion.

2 This matter is before me based upon consent of the parties, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(c). Dated: March 1, 2023 ________________________ Syracuse, NY DAVID E. PEEBLES U.S. Magistrate Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown