Brown v. Un Deux Trois, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Brown v. Un Deux Trois, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: » 3/15/2023 LAMAR BROWN, on behalf of himself and all DATE BLED others similarly situated, Plaintiff, 1:22-ev-8932-MKV “against ORDER OF DISMISSAL UN DEUX TROIS, INC., Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 13]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by May 1, 2023. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,

356 F.3d 492

, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | . . Date: March 15, 2023 MARY AY vyfcoc i New York, NY United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown