UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------------- X : SOURCECODE COMMUNICATIONS LLC, : : Plaintiff, : : - against - : 21-CV-10519 (VSB) (RWL) : IN-TELLIGENT LLC. : ORDER : Defendant. : : --------------------------------------------------------- X

VERNON S. BRODERICK, United States District Judge: Before me is Magistrate Judge Robert W. Lehrburger’s unchallenged Report and Recommendation, entered on May 25, 2022, after I awarded Plaintiff default judgment and referred this matter for an inquest on damages (the “Report”). (Doc. 38 (“R&R”).) Judge Lehrburger recommends that Plaintiff be awarded (1) $153,339 in damages; (2) prejudgment interest at the statutory rate of 9% as calculated by the Clerk of Court; (3) $30,108.32 in attorneys’ fees; (4) $1,356.97 in costs; and (5) postjudgment interest at the statutory rate. (Id. at 1.) In reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, a district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”

(b)(1)(C). Parties may raise specific, written objections to the report and recommendation within 14 days of being served with a copy of the report. Id.; see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). When a party submits a timely objection, a district court reviews de novo the parts of the report and recommendation to which the party objected.

(b)(1)(C); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). When neither party submits an objection to a report and recommendation, or any portion thereof, a district court reviews the report and recommendation for clear error. See Rodriguez v. Clearbrook Mgmt. Inc., No. 22CV04442JLRSLC,

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 5, 2023); Caballero v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., No. 18-CV-7794 (VEC),

, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. June 25, 2019). Judge Lehrburger notified the parties that “[p]ursuant to

(b)(1) and Rules 72, 6(a), and 6(d) of the Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, [they had] fourteen (14) days to file written objections to [his] Report And Recommendation.” (R&R 18.) Here, neither party objected to the Report or requested additional time to file objections. Accordingly, I have reviewed Judge Lehrburger’s thorough and well-reasoned Report for clear error and, after careful review, found none. Accordingly, I ADOPT the Report. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment per the terms stated in the Report and to terminate this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 30, 2023 New York, New York , _ L/AON □ AATO-O7 ha Vernon S. Broderick United States District Judge