Hackett v. Interscope Records, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Hackett v. Interscope Records, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: DATE FILED:__ 3/31/2023 ANASTAS THEODORE HACKETT, Plaintiff, 1:22-cv-1868-MKV -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL INTERSCOPE RECORDS INC., et al., Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed that the parties have reached a settlement in principle in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by May 1, 2023. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action 1s with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,

356 F.3d 492

, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. K. Lys (/ Date: March 31, 2023 MARY Y OCI New York, NY United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown