Wells v. Miller
Trial Court Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: Sonnac nnnnns IK DATE FILED:_04/19/2023 CARL D. WELLS, : Petitioner, : : 21-cv-11231 (LJL) -v- : : ORDER SUPT MARK MILLER, : Respondent. : we KX LEWIS J. LIMAN, United States District Judge: Petition Carl D. Wells (“Petitioner”) submits the attached letter. The Court interprets the letter as a motion to strike the letter of David Bernstein, Dkt. No. 79-1, and as a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s March 27, 2023 Opinion and Order dismissing Petitioner’s petition without prejudice, Dkt. No. 81. The motions are denied.
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(f) gives a court the power to strike “redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous matter” from pleadings, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f), defined by Rule 7 as complaints, cross- and counterclaims, answers, and replies to answers, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). Because Petitioner’s motion to strike is not directed at the pleadings, his motion is DENIED. See Granger v. Gill Abstract Corp., 566 F. Supp. 2d 323, 334 (S.D.N.Y. 2008) (adopting recommendation that the court deny a motion to strike because “[m]otions, declarations and affidavits are not pleadings” that can be stricken under Rule 12(f)).
“A motion for reconsideration should be granted only if the movant identifies ‘an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.’” Spin Master Ltd. v. 158, 2020 WL 5350541, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 4, 2020) (quoting Kolel Beth Yechiel Mechil of Tartikov, Inc. v. YLL Irrevocable Tr., 729 F.3d 99, 104 (2d Cir. 2013)). “The standard for granting a motion for reconsideration ‘is strict, and reconsideration will generally be denied unless the moving party can point to controlling decisions or data that the court overlooked—matters, in other words, that might reasonably be expected to alter the conclusion reached by the Court.’” Justice v. City of New York, 2015 WL 4523154, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. July 27, 2015) (quoting Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995)). Because Petitioner has not identified any controlling decisions or data that the Court overlooked, his motion for reconsideration is DENIED.
SO ORDERED. a Dated: April 19, 2023 wel HE ncn New York, New York LEWIS J. LIMAN United States District Judge (VY (MSR) : (SHNA4;) [vac SFT : PIC (COP...
DB /12-e ME3( COC) AMEE ef Segue Bo STfile Lente bgp Vu Ait) SEAS SEta pePFs □□□ ) : Uypre Oo [WA ZB, BT Spor Tihs Cat hliheg, fa P/O )07 Obfei Aoswer by eSpnduex, Hts, x7 Consrpmriss A Corasrircgan( Milo, LSC Yhpend 6, [UG STE OriF> MUG” 1 $61) fEGIR —. hevtnce oF pgellrr Consel, □ hye. Toke Litttins PIR, TERME TP NT Cilohiaed Cnn fis bent, te aS (pllefiped Pie oy dpecy Ab FG Mey, “ieren Mt, Cyn fey SE Tuekerne BigeSeaag@rs FT Ix Btn, Sue (FE fy □□ Shap Ady hy TS eva la SAyiag LALA er} GLLYES □ Hiwbetea: GRA pts owes KEguts Lu ZA Ledise hy SLAB, Wor Fils oF [PRG aL Sitter , lope ris: Ay 0 2 he FO, Ahi Fhe Cupry Dwopudion , Wkil, Be SE 0k ALL TUFF JluT It , Ee Chik Ache of The Ltn Aber Cotes Jol thar. pe <fos Cofyay Fite Ye KF ADP S46 to Ts THbo Mang MLE, [fo fu fe, Citing Sri Aged 1 Kaw, OF Cree , Ae Aald fine fri bos Cher by Me, Pessina, €895 6 PR Nin i Se iy iy We = Teor fre , Siline, Conds: Aakegivg FiyuwieA a pen ls x Ae Cea AM □□ 0B pag facie Sf Ce S70, fad The TRIG ay, Fibs tox bie eine © Cth qudeintiies, Sl, Baie Lilind I Weg upegty tbe Pr Moef IE par feifree 7 Cipher dbeke FZ BE ge th Lodliog ie a be (ir SA0G20 Wheat ha to’ & □□□ feodlig Hort Mijn elre A fe eliiog™ ILS, 4p ey Loxtatig tir J jepertsipeh, td [ee er ipod Lz OES Gal . : fog: EES CU pie. | “2 Mbit; Mba S27T isi ve <Q Tle Me fifty Tike JUP4 C8. Ty Ay LOLA. Lele fuel Cguae Melee ne AG Cra sat ta 4 ML eT [Mes cadigy( Ae pred CIOS Oo Fibch org Hin, Nip, AO (st f Kombat, LF Citra Puethe OY. Med A Dereluierd Klieg fapiyped, “oe Hae Selly 2°70 Third f ul Zila / te ASS? at. KA Se Dihy lospae Mibu whe > Deca Hp oP Mig fiyoh » Fife ® CA Meh “7 pric Lhe” LUG “Kieren fo Off fhe AM & Ke oe” Sod 20, GB Sif Whe, LS ry | Jone Z ZL, a ~ A oan?
a , 12h 51) ecligcdThn oF SKRUC nr oF flee LY he Oa ip CP COE, SBo5 Cink Abele, parrave Aelia hdek [oe ly OF f2APNG Mie CA , Neh. □□□ BLS. Ao ewe DE aeusral Lerer by bales sf Pity bed by flan Sixth , Uip- Cpt; fhivea EA; D8 Relig Ln feo affeg FA, E Colorey 669, Jssix (86) 25 C bt F) SE LR [OS * LL, Mobi. BMC fda og FO fie per Shir Zee AIGors fo THe fol COWbE VCS Becepel He ZLE Ae, ag Mil, ay / ‘ DO23 JA lw (py ho TEE [OT tks, Gk paaaas i ne ALBANY NY 120 - “a GREEN HAVEN CORRECTIONAL FACILITY seme ROUTE 216 _ 2023PM 4b cscgo02s eee i: □ STORMVILLE, NY 12582 4 as eae SBP ; ah d _ “y ™ / ao Bygone □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ =e □ a □□□ af AR IVE t/ , A The et cote eeahates _ rc}. f FL “F He fa pe “ GA 1 Sips edi ae Dhaai TE Le Gh DUES ANS TEP | (OF fiw ALE S00 fre oO 4 (KEY ; 1) gh pyr fp f fy ‘eel KL J ALL Le ; oe □□□ THT 7 es . / Ul CAL MOF sm af Af a feo Fe □□ Pp » oY 7 Agog □□ A htt / Uda ii MBL LUNG Lf WOE AS COST)
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.