Thomas v. Royce

District Court, S.D. New York

Thomas v. Royce

Trial Court Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC ALLY BILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 6/2/2023. WARREN THOMAS, Petitioner, 1:19-cv-6781 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL MARK ROYCE, Respondent. MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: By order dated March 30, 2023, the Court directed Petitioner to file an amended petition within sixty days. [ECF No. 25]. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the petition. Petitioner has not filed an amended petition. Accordingly, the petition is DENIED. The Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

,

82 S. Ct. 917

,

8 L. Ed. 2d 21

(1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. | Lys (/ Date: June 2, 2023 MARY VYSHOCIL New York, NY United Statés District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown