‘USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | DOC #: _.. □ wanna nnn nnn nnn K | DATE FILED: Ganon | bc RABIA QANOUNTI, MARCOS FIALLOS, — — ANA MARIA VALENCIA, ARNOLD DOBLE, SILIUS BAZARD, and JUAN ELIAS SANTIAGO PAEZ, Plaintiffs, 18-CV-02763 (VF) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL D&H LADIES APPAREL LLC, AB & SONS GROUP, LLC; IAJ APPAREL LLC; ILE CLOTHING, LLC; 396 BPWAY REALTY CORP.; SALVA REALTY CORP.; ISAAC CHETRIT, and ISAK PEREZ, Defendants. wn eK

VALERIE FIGUEREDO, United States Magistrate Judge: In this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act and the New York Labor Law, which is before this Court on the consent of the parties pursuant to

(c) (see ECF No. 131), the parties, having reached an agreement to resolve the action, have placed their proposed, fully executed settlement agreement (see ECF No. 138) before this Court for approval. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.,

(2d Cir. 2015) (requiring judicial fairness review of FLSA settlements). The parties have also submitted letters detailing why they believe the proposed settlement agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. See ECF Nos. 132, 135. This Court has reviewed the parties’ submissions in order to determine whether the proposed agreement represents a reasonable compromise of the claims asserted in this action, and, in light of the totality of the relevant circumstances, including the representations made in the parties’ letters and the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Court finds that the terms of the proposed settlement agreement are fair, reasonable, and adequate, both to redress Plaintiffs’ claims in this action and to compensate Plaintiffs’ counsel for their legal fees, and the agreement is therefore approved. 2. In accordance with the parties’ request, this Court will retain jurisdiction over this matter for the purpose of enforcing the settlement agreement, if necessary. 3. Asaresult of the Court’s approval of the parties’ proposed settlement, this action is hereby discontinued with prejudice and without costs, provided, however, that, within 30 days of the date of this Order, if any aspect of written documentation of the settlement is not completed, then Plaintiff may apply by letter for the restoration of the action to the active calendar of the Court. 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 135 and 138, and to close this case on the Docket of the Court. SO ORDERED. DATED: June 8, 2023

VALERIE FIGUEREDO United States Magistrate Judge Copies to: All counsel (via ECF)