Wimberly v. Stern
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JASON WIMBERLY 22-cv-7581 (VSB) PLAINTIFF TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED V. MELANIE STERN, JAY LAWRENCE HACK, GALLET, DREYER & BERKEY, LLP DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE Now comes Plaintiff Jason Wimberly and pursuant to Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 201 and moves this Court to take judicial notice of Defendant Spring Bank’s Website in its entirety or in the alternative, the following pages on its website: https://www.spring.bank/about-us/ https://www.spring. bank/3-reasons-to-bank-with-a-cdfi-like-us/ https://www.spring. bank/investing-in-us-to-invest-in-you/ https://www.spring.bank/micromobility-for-new-yorkers-via-a-financial-inclusion-grant/ https://www.spring. bank/cdfis-on-the-front-lines-of-emergency-lending/ https://www.spring. bank/ethical-banking/ https://www.americanbanker.com/conference/digital-lending-investing-2017/speakers/melanie-st erm APPLICATION GRANTED https://www.cdfifund. gov/about SO ORDERED A Jenn, BLAH VERNON S. BRODERICK US.D J. 7/21/23 I take judicial notice of these website pages pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 201 because the website pag are publicly available and their existence is not subject to reasonable dispute. See Nat'l Acad. of Television Arts & Scis., Inc. v. Multimedia Sys. Design, Inc., 551 F. Supp. 3d 408, 418 □□□□□□□□□ 2021). I make no findings as to the truth of the matters asserted on any of the website pages. The
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.