UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF : HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, : Plaintiff, : 23-CV-6501 (JMF) -v- : ORDER DAVID SCHLACHET, : Defendant. : wee KX JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: On July 27, 2023, Plaintiff filed a Complaint in which it invoked the Court’s subject- matter jurisdiction pursuant to

. See ECF No. 1, § 10. But Plaintiff merely alleges Defendant’s state of residence, not his state of citizenship. /d. §/ 7. This is not enough. See, e.g., Davis v. Cannick, No. 14-CV-7571 (SJF) (SIL),

, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. Apr. 29, 2015) (“[A] conclusory allegation in the Complaint regarding diversity of citizenship does not extinguish the Court’s responsibility to determine, on its own review of the pleadings, whether subject matter jurisdiction exists.” (internal quotation marks omitted)); Leveraged Leasing Admin. Corp. v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc.,

, 47 (2d Cir. 1996) (reaffirming that “a statement of the parties’ residence is insufficient to establish their citizenship”); see also, e.g., Linardos v. Fortuna,

(2d Cir. 1998) (“For purposes of diversity jurisdiction, a party’s citizenship depends on his domicile.”); Canedy v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.,

(2d Cir. 1997) (“[A]llegations of residency alone cannot establish citizenship ... .”). Accordingly, no later than August 7, 2023, Plaintiff shall file an amended complaint properly alleging the citizenship of each party to this action. If, by that date, Plaintiff does not file an amended complaint establishing this Court’s subject-matter jurisdiction, the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice and without further notice to any party.

SO ORDERED. Dated: July 31, 2023 New York, New York SSE RMAN ited States District Judge