USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTEISST DRIISCTTR OICFT N CEOWU YROTR K LUIS RAUL SOTO, Plaintiff, 23-CV-4271 (JGLC) -against- NOTICE OF ANNAL MANAGEMENT CO. LTD., REASSIGNMENT Defendant.

JESSICA G. L. CLARKE, United States District Judge: This case has been reassigned to the undersigned. Unless and until the Court orders otherwise, all prior orders, dates and deadlines shall remain in effect notwithstanding the case’s reassignment, except that the Court GRANTS Defendant’s request, as stated in its July 6, 2023 letter-motion (ECF No. 8), for an extension until August 4, 2023 to respond to the Complaint. The Court is also in receipt of Defendant’s July 25, 2023 letter-motion (ECF No. 9) and directs the parties to Rule 4(k) of the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices for further instruction. All counsel must familiarize themselves with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices, which are available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jessica-g-l-clarke. It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for all parties appear for a conference with the Court on November 7, 2023 at 11:00 a.m. The conference will be held remotely by Microsoft Teams before Judge Clarke. Additionally, no later than one week before the status conference, the parties are hereby ORDERED to file on ECF a joint letter, described below, updating the Court on the status of the case. The joint letter shall not exceed five pages, and shall provide the following information in separate paragraphs: (1) A statement indicating whether the parties believe they can do without an initial pretrial conference altogether. If so, the Court may enter a case management plan and scheduling order and the parties need not appear; (2) A brief statement of the nature of the action and the principal defenses thereto, and the major legal and factual issues that are most important to resolving the case, whether by trial, settlement or dispositive motion; (3) A brief explanation of why jurisdiction and venue lie in this Court. In any action in which subject matter jurisdiction is founded on diversity of citizenship pursuant to Title

, the letter must explain the basis for the parties’ belief that diversity of citizenship exists. Where any party is a corporation, the letter shall state both the place of incorporation and the principal place of business. In cases where any party is a partnership, limited partnership, limited liability company or trust, the letter shall state the citizenship of each of the entity’s members, shareholders, partners, and/or trustees. See, e.g., Handelsman v. Bedford Vill. Assocs. L.P.,

(2d Cir. 2000). If this information is lengthy, it may be included in an Appendix to the letter, not to be included in the page limit; (4) A statement of all existing deadlines, due dates and/or cut-off dates; (5) A brief description of any outstanding motions; (6) A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place and of any discovery that is necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations; (7) A brief description of the status of prior settlement discussions, without disclosing exact offers and demands; and (8) Any other information that the parties believe may assist the Court in advancing the case to settlement or trial, including, but not limited to, a description of any dispositive issue or novel issue raised by the case. If this case has been settled or otherwise terminated, counsel are not required to submit such a letter or to appear, provided that a stipulation of discontinuance, voluntary dismissal or other proof of termination is filed on the docket prior to the date of the conference, using the appropriate ECF Filing Event. See SDNY ECF Rules & Instructions §§ 13.17-13.19 & App’x A, available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing In accordance with the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices, requests for an extension or adjournment may be made only by letter-motion filed on ECF and must be received at least 48 hours before the deadline or conference. The written submission must state (1) the original date and the new date requested; (2) the number of previous requests for adjournment or extension; (3) whether these previous requests were granted or denied; (4) the reason for the extension or adjournment; (5) whether the adversary consents and, if not, the reasons given by the adversary for refusal to consent; and (6) to the extent applicable, the date of the parties’ next scheduled appearance before the Court. Unless counsel are notified that the conference has been adjourned, it will be held as scheduled. Dated: August 1, 2023 New York, New York SO ORDERED. —~ fr C ( Lar Ke

JESSICA G. L. CLARKE United States District Judge