District Court, S.D. New York, 2023

Palmer v. Regent Hospitality Linen Services, LLC

Palmer v. Regent Hospitality Linen Services, LLC
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided August 2, 2023
Palmer v. Regent Hospitality Linen Services, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

ae NISAR LAW GROUP, P.C.

N | G One Grand Central Place hu 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 4600 curtovwent Liriaavion arvoaweys New York, NY 10165 Susan Ghim, Of Counsel [email protected] Main: (212) 600-9534 Direct: (646) 889-1011 August 1, 2023 aa rer: MEMO ENDORSED Hon. Victoria Reznak, USMJ United States District Court, SDNY Quarropas St. White Plains, NY 10601-4150 Re: 22cv6478 Palmer v Regent Hospitality Linen Services, LLC Request for Cheeks Motion deadline and adjournment sine die of pending deadlines Dear Judge Seibel: As the Court is aware, the undersigned counsel represents Defendant Regent Hospitality Linen Services, LLC (“Regent”) in the above referenced matter. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant Regent respectfully requests a deadline to file the parties’ fully executed settlement agreement and letter motion for the Court’s approval pursuant to Cheeks and adjourn sine die all other future Court deadlines. See, Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015) There was no prior request by any party for a deadline for filing their fully executed settlement agreement, Cheeks motion and adjournment sine die.

A court ordered mediation of the parties Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and New York Labor Law (“NYLL”) disputes was held on or about May 23, 2023 before the appointed Mediator Alan Gettner. The mediator’s final report stating that “agreement was reached on all issues” was filed on or about May 26, 2023. [ECF doc. 28] On or about May 24, 2023, this case was redesignated to your Honor as the Magistrate Judge. A consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge was so ordered by District Judge Cathy Seibel on or about June 20, 2023. [ECF doc. 30] Without disclosing confidential informations, Defendant Regent was prepared to make prompt lump sum payments of the agreed upon settlement amount after the Court’s approval of the parties’ settlement agreement pursuant to Cheeks. Id. However, Plaintiff's counsel has not responded to the undersigned’s repeated requests for a finalized settlement agreement with the lump sum payment provisions and without the confession of judgment as an installment payment agreement was not required. Counsel for Defendant Regent prepared attorney checks for payments of the settlement amount subject to 1099 reporting and forwarded copies of the checks to Plaintiff's counsel. Plaintiff's counsel demanded a copy of the payroll check reflecting the portion of the settlement amount subject to W-2 reporting. However, undersigned counsel informed Plaintiff’s counsel that Defendant Regent could not do as requested without a signed agreement and an executed form W-4 from Plaintiff. Undersigned Counsel also advised Plaintiffs counsel that this is an ordinary practice and procedure, specifically that payroll checks may not be processed until the Court approves an agreement in FLSA matters and the Plaintiff has submitted an executed W- 4. Defendant Regent further forwarded an excerpt of correspondence from its payroll service requesting a copy of the court ordered settlement agreement in order to process such payroll check that is subject to tax withholdings. Defendant Regent has repeatedly communicated to Plaintiff through his counsel that it is prepared to promptly make these payments to Plaintiff and would like to amicably move forward with the parties’ settlement. To date however, Plaintiff's counsel has not responded to the aforementioned communications from the undersigned and has not forwarded any redlined draft agreements reflecting the lump sum payment terms.

Based on the foregoing, Defendant Regent respectfully requests that the Court designate a deadline for the parties’ settlement agreement and Cheeks motion to be filed for the Court’s review and approval and any and other further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Thank you.

Respectfully submitted, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to respond to Defendant's letter /s/ Susan Ghim motion (ECF No. 31) SS by August 9, 2023.

BY: Susan Ghim, Of Counsel yews fi .

SO ORDERED.

VIA ECF TO: MLE ge fi Hon, Victoria Réznik, U.S.M.J.

All attorneys of record Dated: 8/2/23

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.