Mombrun v. The New York Hotel Pension Fund
Mombrun v. The New York Hotel Pension Fund
Trial Court Opinion
USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K D DO AC TE # : F _ IL__ E_ D_ :_ __ _8_ _/_ 7__ _/_ 2__ 0__ _2_ __ 3__ __ _ __ ---------------------------------------------------------------X MARIE S. MOMBRUN, : : Plaintiff, : ORDER : -v- : 22-CV-4970 (PGG) (JLC) : THE NEW YORK HOTEL PENSION : FUND, et ano. : : Defendants. : ---------------------------------------------------------------X
JAMES L. COTT, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Marie Mombrun, in her letter to the Court dated July 31, 2023, has requested the appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 23). Mrs. Mombrun indicated in her prior letter to the Court dated April 24, 2023, that she wants to proceed with her case against the New York Hotel Pension Fund (Dkt. No. 22), but requests the Court’s assistance in obtaining a lawyer, citing the costs and difficulty of litigation. The Court does not have a budget to pay appointed counsel in civil cases and has no power to enlist a lawyer to serve without pay. See Mallard v. U.S. Dist. Ct. for the S. Dist. of Iowa,
490 U.S. 296, 301–10 (1989). The Court must be mindful that “volunteer lawyer time is a precious commodity,” and “courts should not grant such applications [for appointment of counsel] indiscriminately.” Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co.,
877 F.2d 170, 172(2d Cir. 1989). For the Court to order the appointment of counsel, a petitioner must make “a threshold showing of some 1 likelihood of merit.” Johnston v. Maha,
606 F.3d 39, 41(2d Cir. 2010) (quoting Cooper,
877 F.2d at 174); Carmona v. U.S. Bureau of Prisons,
243 F.3d 629, 632(2d Cir. 2001). Only then can the Court consider the other factors appropriate to the determination of whether counsel should be appointed: “the [petitioner’s] ability to investigate the crucial facts, . . . the [petitioner’s] ability to present the case, the complexity of the legal issues and any special reason in that case why appointment
of counsel would be more likely to lead to a just determination.” Johnston,
606 F.3d at 42(quoting Hodge v. Police Officers,
802 F.2d 58, 60–61 (2d Cir. 1986)). At this point in the proceedings, the Court denies Mrs. Mombrun’s application for appointment of counsel without prejudice to renewal because the Court cannot conclude based on the current record that the claims are substantial or that she is likely to succeed on the merits. However, for legal assistance Mrs. Mombrun should contact the New York
Legal Assistance Group’s (“NYLAG”) Clinic for Pro Se Litigants in the Southern District of New York, which is a free legal clinic staffed by attorneys and paralegals to assist those who are representing themselves in civil lawsuits in this Court. The clinic is run by a private organization; it is not part of, or run by, the Court. It cannot accept filings on behalf of the Court, which must still be made by any pro se party through the Pro Se Intake Unit.
To receive limited-scope assistance from the clinic, parties may complete the clinic’s intake form on their computer or phone at: https://tinyurl.com/NYLAG- ProSe-OI. If parties have questions regarding the form or they are unable to 2 complete it, they may leave a voicemail at (212) 659-5190. The Clinic is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m., except on days when the Court is closed. A copy of the flyer with details of the clinic is attached to this Order. The parties are directed to provide a further status report to the Court by September 30, 2023. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York August 7, 2023
Are [Mf A L. COTT (“4 States Magistrate Judge
SD lee Pe ew Since 1990, NYLAG has provided free civil legal services New York ME Legal Assistance Group to New Yorkers who cannot afford private attorneys.
Free Legal Assistance for Self-Represented Civil Litigants in District Court for the Southern District Of New Yor|
NYLAG Legal Clinic for Pro Se Litigants in the Southern District of New York is a fre clinic staffed by attorneys, law students and paralegals to assist those who are themselves or planning to represent themselves in civil lawsuits in the outhern District of New York. The clinic does not provide full representation. The clinic, is not part of or run by the court, assists litigants with federal civil cases including involving civil rights, employment discrimination, labor law, social security benefit: and tax.
Contact the Clinic: (212) 659-6190 or complete our online intake form (found here: A staff member will contact you within a few days.
looking for assistance can also contact the clinic at the kiosk located across the hall the pro se clinic office in the courthouse.
this time, the clinic offers remote consultations only. Requests for in- appointments will be reviewed on a case-to-case basis. and Hours: Marshall United States Courthouse
Room LL22 40 Foley Square New York, NY 10007 (212) 659 6190 Open weekdays 10 a.m. — 4 p.m. Closed on federal and court holidays
ii □□□□ □
Reference
- Status
- Unknown