District Court, S.D. New York, 2023

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY POLICING DURING SUMMER 2020 DEMONSTRATIONS

IN RE: NEW YORK CITY POLICING DURING SUMMER 2020 DEMONSTRATIONS
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided September 7, 2023
IN RE: NEW YORK CITY POLICING DURING SUMMER 2020 DEMONSTRATIONS

Trial Court Opinion

eee ene OE IEE EIDE IEE IEEE EEE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In Re: New York City Policing During Summer 2020 Demonstrations 20 Civ. 8924 (CM)(GWG) {PROPBSED| ORDER This filing is related to: Payne v. de Blasio, 20 Civ. 8924; At SDNY People of the State of New York v. _X JCUMENT City of New York, No. 21-cv-322; ELECTRONICALLY FILED Gray, et al y. City of New York, et al, 'poc tm dees No. 21-cv-06610; \ ATE FILED: get3 Rolon, et al v. City of New York, et al. , No. 21-cv-2548.

For good cause shown, and in consideration of the Parties’ Joint Motion to Dismiss Injunctive Claims with Prejudice and Retain Jurisdiction, the Court hereby GRANTS the Joint Motion, and specifically retains jurisdiction to enforce attached Stipulated Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) (the “Agreement”) in accordance with its terms for the duration of the Agreement, and incorporates into this Order the terms of the Agreement, which is annexed hereto as Exhibit A. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994) (recognizing that a federal district court may retain jurisdiction to enforce a “dismissal-producing settlement agreement” in its order): Hendrickson v. United States, 79] F.3d 354, 358 (2nd Cir. 2015); see, e.g., So-Ordered Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal With Prejudice, Dannhauser v. TSG Reporting, Inc., No. 16 Civ. 747 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2017), ECF No. 93.!

Subject to the terms of this Order, the Court dismisses the remaining injunctive claims in the consolidated cases in the above-captioned action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). ' See also Memo Endorsement Order, Dannhauser vy. TSG Reporting, Inc., No. 16 Civ. 747, (S.D.N.Y. July 9. 2019), ECF. No. 109 at 1. 13 (Court's endorsement of magistrate judge’s report and recommendation finding the Court did have ancillary jurisdiction to decide dispute.)

SMe □ ONY OY YON ON a er ee OO ee NN Mewes Se A SO ORDERED this 4 day ahpbinbe, 2023. } tbls te Hon. Colleen McMahon United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.