Purisima v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
Purisima v. New Jersey Transit Corp.
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANTON PURISIMA, Plaintiff, 23-CV-8226 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORP, et al., UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On May 29, 2013, Plaintiff was barred from filing any new action in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without first obtaining from the Court leave to file. See Purisima v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., ECF 1:13-CV-1068, 7 (LAP) (S.D.N.Y. May 29, 2013). Plaintiff files this new pro se case, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the Court. This action is therefore dismissed without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the May 29, 2013 order. The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 22, 2023 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown