Brown v. Danice Stores, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Brown v. Danice Stores, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT boeken FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: 10/10/2023 _ ALTAUNE BROWN, Plaintiff, . 1:23-cv-341-MKV -against- DANICE STORE, INC. and 305 WEST HOLDING ORDER OF DISMISSAL CORP., Defendants.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Plaintiff informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle [ECF No. 28]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by November 10, 2023. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,

356 F.3d 492

, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | Lys (/ Date: October 10, 2023 MARY Y VYSKOCI New York, NY United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown