District Court, S.D. New York, 2023

Brown v. New York City Human Resources Administration

Brown v. New York City Human Resources Administration
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided October 25, 2023
Brown v. New York City Human Resources Administration

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DESHANAE L. BROWN, Plaintiff, -against- 23-cv-9113 (ER) NEW YORK CITY HUMAN RESOURCES ORDER OF SERVICE ADMINISTRATION; MOUSTAPHA BOUKARI; FRANK AGBI; ASRA HORTON; LAURIE MOORE; CANDI RUFUS, Defendants.

EDGARDO RAMOS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff brings this pro se action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the American with Disabilities of 1990, the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993, and the New York State Human Rights Laws, alleging that Defendants discriminated against her based on her color, sex, and disability. By order dated October 18, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”).

DISCUSSION Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, she is entitled to rely on the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.1 Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)).

1 Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that summonses be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have served the summonses and complaint until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date summonses are issued.

To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants the New York City Human Rights Administration, Moustapha Boukari, Frank Agbi, Asra Horton, Laurie Moore, and Candi Rufus through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for each Defendant. The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendants.

If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date the summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service).

Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if her address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so.

CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is instructed to issue summonses, complete the USM-285 form with the addresses for the New York City Human Rights Administration, Moustapha Boukari, Frank Agbi, Asra Horton, Laurie Moore, and Candi Rufus, and deliver all documents necessary to effect service to the U.S. Marshals Service.

The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED. man Ome 9 QL EDGARDORAMOS/ United States District Judge DEFENDANTS AND SERVICE ADDRESSES New York City Human Rights Administration Greenwich Street, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10006 Moustapha Boukari E. 16th Street, 12th Floor New York, New York 10003 Frank Agbi Rider Avenue, 3rd Floor Bronx, New York 10451 Asra Horton Rider Avenue, 1st Floor Bronx, New York 10451 Laurie Moore 1365 Jerome Avenue, 2nd Floor Bronx, New York 10452 Candi Rufus E. 16th Street, 12th Floor New York, New York 10003

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.