Nike, Inc. v. Stockx LLC
Trial Court Opinion
(.. DLA Piper LLP (US) 1251 Avenue of the Americas 27th Floor DLA PIPER New York, New York 10020-1104 www.dlapiper.com MEMO ENDORSED) = | occuxes: DOCUMENT November 3, 2023 ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: VIA ECF DATE FILED: 11/03/2023 The Honorable Valerie Caproni United States District Court Southern District of New York Foley Square, Room 240 New York, New York 10007 Re: Nike, Inc. v. StockX LLC, No. 22 CV 00983 (VEC) (S.D.N.Y.) Dear Judge Caproni: Pursuant to Your Honor’s Individual Rule 5(B)(Gi), Plaintiff Nike, Inc. (“Nike”) and Defendant StockX LLC (“StockX” and together with Nike, the “Parties”) respectfully submit this joint letter requesting the sealed treatment of the Parties’ Daubert opposition briefings to exclude proffered expert testimony (the “Oppositions”’).
In support of the Oppositions, the Parties each cite to material that has been designated confidential pursuant to the Stipulated Protective Order in this case (Dkt. No. 52), including expert reports and the transcripts of expert depositions.
As required by the Stipulated Protective Order and in accordance with Your Honor’s practices, the Parties will file redacted public versions of the Motions and supporting materials where appropriate. See Lugosch vy. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006) (‘[C]Jourts in this District routinely seal documents to prevent the disclosure of a party’s confidential or competitively sensitive business information.”); Regeneron Pharms., Inc. □□□ Novartis Pharma AG, 2021 WL 243943, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 25, 2021) (collecting cases).
In order to permit the Parties an opportunity to review the opposing Party’s Opposition and exhibits, and confer with their clients regarding any necessary sealed treatment, the Parties jointly request that the Court approve the filing of the Oppositions under seal in the first instance and the following schedule for exchanging and filing proposed redactions: (1) the Parties shall exchange proposed redactions for their confidential information by Wednesday, November 8, 2023; (2) the Parties shall each file, under seal, their proposed redactions with the Court by Friday, November 10, 2023, along with a publicly-filed brief justifying sealed treatment. The Parties believe that this process will ensure any proposed redactions are judiciously applied and will permit the Parties the opportunity to adequately justify their proposals under Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.
DLA PIPER November 3, 2023 Page Two /s/ Tamar Y. Duvdevani Megan K. Bannigan DLA PIPER LLP (US) Megan K. Bannigan David H. Bernstein Tamar Y. Duvdevani Jyotin Hamid Marc E. Miller Justin Ferrone Michael D. Hynes Kathryn C. Saba Andrew J. Peck Debevoise & Plimpton LLP Jared Greenfield 66 Hudson Boulevard 1251 Avenue of The Americas, 27th FI. New York, New York, 10001 New York, NY 10020 Telephone: (212) 909-6000 Telephone: (212) 335-4500 Facsimile: (212) 335-4501 Christopher S. Ford Debevoise & Plimpton LLP Michael Fluhr 650 California Street Mission Street, Suite 2400 San Francisco, CA 94108 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 738-5705 Telephone: (415) 836-2500 Facsimile: (415) 836-2501 Rob Potter Briggs M. Wright Melissa A. Reinckens Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP 4365 Executive Dr., Suite 1100 1114 Avenue of the Americas San Diego, CA 92101 New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (619) 699-2798 Telephone: (212) 775-8733 Facsimile: (619) 764-6624 Jeffrey B. Morganroth Jane W. Wise Morganroth & Morganroth, PLLC Eighth Street, NW 344 N. Old Woodward Ave, #200 Washington, D.C. 20004 Birmingham, MI 48075 Telephone: (202) 799-4149 Telephone: (248) 864-4001 Facsimile: (202) 863-7849 Attorneys for Defendant StockX LLC Attorneys for Plaintiff Nike, Inc. Application GRANTED.
SO ORDERED. \i Qe (¢ 11/03/2023 HON. VALERIE CAPRONI TINTTET) STATES |DNISTRICT TTINGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.