Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited v. General Electric Company

FE S =| * DOCUMENT FISH & RICHARDSON ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED:_ 11/30/2023 VIA ECF renewed motion to seal, which significantly narrows the proposed redactions, is sufficiently tailored in accordance with Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 124 Cir. 2006), and its progeny. Accordingly, the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 821 and permit the documents under seal to remain under seal.

United States District Judge SO ORDERED: Southern District of New York . ‘ZZ Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthc k ‘Ah A AAAL + ker New York, NY 10007 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Re: = Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited (Plaintiff) v. GE et al. (Defendants) Case No.: 18-cv-11386 (VSB) Dear Judge Parker: Pursuant to Your Honor’s Order at ECF No. 813 (“Order”), the parties respectfully submit this joint renewed motion to seal regarding their amended pleadings. Neither party opposes the other’s requests set forth below.

Spectrum’s Statement Regarding Its Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 795) (“TAC”) Concurrently with this renewed motion, Spectrum is re-filing its TAC with more narrowly tailored redactions 1n accordance with the Order. Spectrum is removing nearly all the previously proposed redactions because the once-sensitive information has “become stale as this litigation has progressed,” ECF No. 813 at 2, including because Defendants publicly disclosed that information via patent applications and/or by launching the StarGuide. The revised redactions seek only to protect competitively sensitive engineering drawings and documents that Spectrum disclosed to Defendants during the due diligence. See, e.g., TAC JJ 203, 226, 244, Ex. 29.

Defendants’ Statement Regarding Their Answer (ECF No. 798) The parties agree that no redactions are necessary in Defendants’ Answer (Doc. 798) and that the Answer, as well as Exhibit A thereto, may be unsealed.

Spectrum’s Statement Regarding Its Response to Defendants’ Answer (ECF No. 802) Spectrum respectfully submits that no narrowing of redactions is necessary. The proposed redactions are already limited to competitively sensitive engineering drawings and documents that Spectrum disclosed to Defendants during the due diligence. See Response § 35.

For these reasons, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant this renewed motion to seal.

KY!

Hon. Katharine H. Parker November 29, 2023 Page 2 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Esha Bandyopadhyay /s/ Marla R. Butler Esha Bandyopadhyay (Pro Hac Vice) Marla R. Butler Fish & Richardson P.C. THOMPSON HINE LLP Arguello Street, Suite 400 Two Alliance Center Redwood City, CA 94063 3560 Lenox Road NE, Suite 1600 Tel: 650 839 5070 Atlanta, Georgia 30326 Fax: 650 839 5071 Tel.: (404) 541-2900 Email: [email protected] Fax: (404) 541-2905 [email protected] Michael F. Autuoro (MA 2932) Fish & Richardson P.C. Jesse Jenike-Godshalk (pro hac vice) Times Square, 20 Floor 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2000 New York, NY 10036 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Tel: 212 765 5070 Tel.: (513) 352-6700 Fax: 212 258 2291 Fax: (513) 241-4771 Email: [email protected] [email protected] Roger A. Denning (Pro Hac Vice) Jeffrey Metzcar (pro hac vice) James Yang (Pro Hac Vice) Discovery Place Fish & Richardson P.C. 10050 Innovation Drive 12860 El Camino Real, Suite 400 Miamisburg, Ohio 45342 San Diego, CA 92130 Tel.: (937) 443-6841 Tel: 858 678 5070 Fax: (937) 430-3781 Fax: 858 678 5099 [email protected] Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Brian Lanciault Adam J. Kessel (Pro Hac Vice) 300 Madison Avenue, 27th Floor Alexander M. Pechette (Pro Hac Vice) New York, New York 10017 Philip K. Chen (Pro Hac Vice) Tel.: (212) 344-5680 Daniel H. Wade (CT 443482) Fax: (212) 344-6101 Fish & Richardson P.C. [email protected] One Marina Park Drive Boston, MA 02210 Attorneys for Defendants GE HealthCare Tel: 617 542 5070 Technologies, Inc., and GE Precision Fax: 617 542 8906 Healthcare, LLC Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff Spectrum Dynamics Medical Limited