McGlynn v. The Reporter Inc.
McGlynn v. The Reporter Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
ATES DISTR EE rep CO □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NOV 1 4 2023 ° WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ‘ □□ toewengutt □□ STERN DisTRICL DAVID MCGLYNN, Plaintiff, Vv. 23-CV-78 (JLS) (JJM) THE REPORTER, INC., doing business as The Niagara Reporter, DOES 1 THROUGH 10 INCLUSIVE, Defendants.
DECISION AND ORDER On January 25, 2028, Plaintiff David McGlynn commenced this action, which seeks relief against Defendants The Reporter, Inc., and Does 1 Through 10 Inclusive! under the Copyright Act for Defendants’ alleged infringement of his copyrighted photograph. See Dkt. 1. McGlynn asked the Clerk of the Court to enter default on June 7, 2023, after Defendant neither appeared nor responded to the complaint.? See Dkt. 7. The Clerk entered default on June 8, 2028. Dkt. 8. And on August 10, 2023, McGlynn moved for default judgment. Dkt. 10. This Court referred the case to United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah J. McCarthy to hear and determine, and to report and recommend on, all matters in
1 A summons was issued, and affidavit of service returned, only as to Defendant The Reporter, Inc. See Dkt. 4; Dkt. 6. The Court therefore refers only to that Defendant in this decision and order. 2 Defendant still has not appeared as of the date of this decision and order.
this case, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C). Dkt. 12. On September 6, 2023, Judge McCarthy issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R), recommending that this Court (1) grant McGlynn’s motion for default judgment, and (2) enter default judgment against Defendant as requested by McGlynn, without a hearing. See Dkt. 13. Neither party objected to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. See
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). A district court may accept, reject, or modify the findings or recommendations of a magistrate judge.
28 U.S.C. § 6386(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(8). A district court must conduct a de novo review of those portions of a magistrate judge’s recommendation to which a party objects. See
28 U.S.C. § 6386(b)(1)(C); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). But neither
28 U.S.C. § 636nor Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72 requires a district court to review the recommendation of a magistrate judge to which no objections are raised. See Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140, 149-50(1985). Though not required to do so here, this Court nevertheless reviewed Judge McCarthy’s R&R. Based on that review, and absent any objections, the Court accepts and adopts the R&R (Dkt. 13).
For the reasons stated above and in the R&R, the Court GRANTS McGlynn’s motion for default judgment (Dkt. 10). The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment against Defendant The Reporter, Inc., as follows: e Awarding McGlynn $6,000 in statutory damages, pursuant to
17 U.S.C. § 504(c); e Awarding McGlynn a total of $732 in costs—comprised of $402 for the filing fee related to this case and $330 for costs incurred in serving the complaint; and e Awarding McGlynn post-judgment interest, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 14, 2028 Buffalo, New York
/ a / C< JOHN L.SINATRASSRD YWNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown