Brock v. CVS Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Brock v. CVS Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee eK TERRELL K. BROCK, Plaintiff, -against- 22 CIVIL 4014 (VB) JUDGMENT CVS CORPORATION; ASHLEY CAMACHO, CVS Employee; LEONARDO CORONADO, CVS Manager; CITY OF WHITE PLAINS; P.O. JOSE LUIS FORMOSO; P.O. C. BROWNING; P.O. SCHNEIDER; P.O. BEALL; P.O. LEVITO; P.O. GLYNN; P.O. DIPATERIO; P.O. HORGAN; and P.O. VANDERWALKER, Defendants. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated August 26, 2024, Defendants’ motions for summary judgment are GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438

, 444- 45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York August 27, 2024

DANIEL ORTIZ Acting Clerk of Court BY: AAVGAD HK WMG Gc Deputy Clerk

Reference

Status
Unknown