Hernandez v. Monaghan
Hernandez v. Monaghan
Trial Court Opinion
USONUITTEHDE RSTNA DTIESST RDIICSTT ROIFC TN ECWOU YROTR K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X : RICKY HERNANDEZ, : : Plaintiff, : : 24 Civ. 5924 (JPC) -v- : : ORDER HELEN MONAGHAN, : : Defendant. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------------- X
JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: Under the terms of the Court’s August 12, 2024, order at Docket Number 12, the parties were required to submit a joint letter to the Court by August 28, 2024, addressing the following in separate paragraphs: (1) A brief statement of the nature of the action and the principal defenses thereto; (2) A brief explanation of why jurisdiction1 and venue lie in this Court; (3) A brief description of all outstanding motions and/or all outstanding requests to file motions; (4) A brief description of any discovery that has already taken place, and that which will be necessary for the parties to engage in meaningful settlement negotiations; (5) A list of all prior settlement discussions, including the date, the parties involved, and the approximate duration of such discussions, if any; (6) The estimated length of trial; and (7) Any other information that the parties believe may assist this Court in resolving the action.
Dkt. 12 at 1-2. By that same date, the parties were also required to submit to the Court a proposed
1 As Plaintiff invokes this Court’s diversity jurisdiction, Dkt. 1 ¶ 7, the parties shall specifically address whether Plaintiff has adequately alleged the parties’ citizenship. See John Birch Soc’y v. Nat’l Broad. Co.,
377 F.2d 194, 199 (2d Cir. 1967) (“[I]t has long been held that a statement of residence, unlike domicile, tells the court only where the parties are living and not of which state they are citizen.”). case management plan and scheduling order, a template of which is available at https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-john-p-cronan. /d. at 2. That deadline has passed, and the docket does not reflect the entry of such a joint letter. The Court sua sponte extends the deadline for the joint letter to August 30, 2024. If the parties have not filed a joint letter by that date, the Court will order the parties to appear for a status conference on this matter. SO ORDERED. Dated: August 29, 2024 Vee New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown