Horsey v. United States of America
Horsey v. United States of America
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KEVIN HORSEY, Plaintiff, No. 24-CV-5030 (KMK) -against- ORDER OF SERVICE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; SEVEN CORNERS, INC., Defendants. KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Kevin Horsey, who is currently incarcerated as a federal prisoner in the Federal Correctional Institution in Otisville, New York, brings this action pro se, asserting claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act and state law. He sues the United States of America and Seven Corners, Inc. By order dated July 5, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), that is, without prepayment of fees.1 As explained below, the Court directs service on Defendants. I. Discussion Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, he is entitled to rely on assistance from the Court and the United States Marshals Service (“USMS”) to effect service.2 Walker v. Schult,
717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also
28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The
1 Prisoners are not exempt from paying the full filing fee, even when they have been granted permission to proceed IFP. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1).
2Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within ninety days of the date a complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have effected service until the Court reviewed the Complaint and ordered that summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until ninety days after the date summonses are issued. officers of the court shall issue and serve all process . . . in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (providing that the court must order the USMS to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP). To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants through the USMS, the Clerk of Court is respectfully instructed to fill out a USMS Receipt and Return form (“USM-285 form”) for
each Defendant. The Clerk of Court is also respectfully instructed to issue summonses for Defendants and to deliver to the USMS all the paperwork necessary for the USMS to effect service. If the Complaint is not served within ninety days after the date the summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong,
682 F.3d 56, 63(2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service). Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if his address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so.
II. Conclusion The Court respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to mail an information package to Plaintiff. The Court also directs service on the United States of America and Seven Corners, Inc. The Court further asks the Clerk of Court to: (1) issue summonses for the United States of America and Seven Corners, Inc.; (2) complete USM-285 forms with the service addresses for the United States of America and Seven Corners, Inc.; (3) mark the box labeled “Check for service on U.S.A.” on the USM-285 form for the United States of America; and (4) deliver all documents necessary to effect service of the summonses and the complaint on the United States of America and Seven Corners, Inc. to the USMS. SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 11, 2024 White Plains, New York / Hs ZS KENNETH M. KARAS United States District Judge
SERVICE ADDRESSES
Attorney General of the United States United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20530 United States Attorney Southern District of New York Civil Division 86 Chambers Street, 3rd Floor New York, New York 10007 Seven Corners, Inc. 303 Congressional Boulevard Carmel, Indiana 46032
Reference
- Status
- Unknown