Rodgers v. B & H Photo

District Court, S.D. New York

Rodgers v. B & H Photo

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MELODY JANNEL RODGERS, Plaintiff, 24-CV-6910 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL B&H PHOTO, Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff, who is appearing pro se, brings this action against B&H Photo, invoking the Court’s diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff filed her complaint on September 3, 2024. On August 21, 2024, Plaintiff also filed a substantially similar complaint where she alleged the same set of facts against B&H Photo. See Rodgers v. B&H Photo, No. 24-CV-6642. As this new complaint raises the same claims as the prior action, no useful purpose would be served by litigating this duplicate lawsuit. Therefore, this complaint is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff’s pending case filed under docket number 24-CV-6642. CONCLUSION Plaintiff’s complaint is dismissed as duplicative of Rodgers v. B&H Photo, No. 24-CV- 6642. The Court certifies, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 18, 2024 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown