Epperson v. House of Assembly
Epperson v. House of Assembly
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHRIS JONATHAN EPPERSON, Plaintiff, -against- HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY; RUSSIA, 24cv6852 (LTS) PRESIDENT; CHINA, VICE PRESIDENT; CIVIL JUDGMENT CANADA, SECRETARY OF STATE; AUSTRIA, AMBASSADOR HEAD OF STATE; UNITED NATIONS; HOUSE OF COMMONS, Defendants. For the reasons stated in the October 16, 2024, order, this action is dismissed. The complaint, filed in forma pauperis under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), is dismissed as frivolous. See
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 18, 2024 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown