Pierre v. Doe

District Court, S.D. New York

Pierre v. Doe

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KATHELINE M. PIERRE, Plaintiff, 23-cv-11248 (LTS) -against- CIVIL JUDGMENT JANE DOE; UPS STORE, Defendants. For the reasons stated in the October 11, 2024, order, Plaintiff’s complaint, filed IFP under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(1), is dismissed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B)(ii), and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). Plaintiff is warned that, if she abuses the privilege of proceeding IFP by filing complaints that lack merit, the Court will direct her to show cause why she should not be barred from filing new actions IFP unless she receives prior permission. See

28 U.S.C. § 1651

. The Court certifies under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,

369 U.S. 438, 444-45

(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 17, 2024 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown