Haywood v. Andre Bakers Funeral Home
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TAISHA HAYWOOD; NICOLE HAYWOOD; LAVAUGHN HAYWOOD, Plaintiffs, 24cv4275 (LTS) -against- CIVIL JUDGMENT ANDRE BAKERS FUNERAL HOME; KAREN BAKER; ANDRE F. BAKER, Defendants.
For the reasons stated in the October 22, 2024, order, this action is dismissed. The Court has dismissed the claims brought by Plaintiffs Taisha Haywood and Lavaughn Haywood without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915; Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). The Court has also dismissed the claims brought by Nicole Haywood, without prejudice, for failure to comply with the Court’s July 17, 2024 order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444- (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 24, 2024 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.