Matthew v. Building Security Services Owner
Matthew v. Building Security Services Owner
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IZEH MATTHEW, Plaintiff, -against- 24-CV-2447 (LTS) BUILDING SECRURITY SERVICES ORDER OF DISMISSAL OWNGER; CREIG RECRUITER FOR BSS SECREUTY,1 Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated April 29, 2024, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within sixty days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction of any state law claims Plaintiff may be asserting. The Court certifies under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).
1 The Court quotes the caption verbatim. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in this action. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 16, 2024 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown