Thomas v. Dr. King
Thomas v. Dr. King
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JIMMY THOMAS, Plaintiff, 24-CV-7027 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL DR. KING, et al., UNDER
28 U.S.C. § 1651Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On August 11, 2003, the Court barred Plaintiff from filing in this court any new civil action without first obtaining from the court leave to file. See Thomas v. Oscaleary, No. 03-CV- 3282 (MBM) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 11, 2003). Plaintiff files this pro se action and seeks in forma pauperis status, but has not sought leave from the court to file. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the August 11, 2003 order. The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to issue judgment in this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 18, 2024 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown