District Court, S.D. New York, 2024

Rivera v. Target Corporation

Rivera v. Target Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided September 20, 2024
Rivera v. Target Corporation

Trial Court Opinion

eres Wels 2B DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee DATE FILED:_ 9/20/2024 Alondra Y. Rivera, Plaintiff, 1:24-cv- 06965 (JPO) (SDA) -against- ORDER OF SERVICE Target Corporation et al.

Defendants.

STEWART D. AARON, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff brings this pro se action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101- 12213; the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2654; and the New York State and City Human Rights Laws, N.Y. Exec. Law §§ 290- 297; N.Y. City Admin. Code §§ 8-101- 131. By order dated September 18, 2024, the Court granted Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP).

DISCUSSION Because Plaintiff has been granted permission to proceed IFP, she is entitled to assistance from the Court and the U.S. Marshals Service to effect service.? Walker v. Schult, 717 F.3d. 119, 123 n.6 (2d Cir. 2013); see also 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (“The officers of the court shall issue and serve all process ... in [IFP] cases.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (the court must order the Marshals Service to serve if the plaintiff is authorized to proceed IFP)). ‘Although Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure generally requires that a summons be served within 90 days of the date the complaint is filed, Plaintiff is proceeding IFP and could not have effected service until the Court reviewed the complaint and ordered that any summonses be issued. The Court therefore extends the time to serve until 90 days after the date any summonses issue.

To allow Plaintiff to effect service on Defendants Target Corporation, Roundel, Quinn Nelson, Allison Franklin, Lyonna Jackson, Kathleen Henry, Sidra Khan, Helen Kwon, Erin Sieling, and Kelly Roque, through the U.S. Marshals Service, the Clerk of Court is instructed to fill out a U.S. Marshals Service Process Receipt and Return form (USM-285 form) for each Defendant.

The Clerk of Court is further instructed to issue summonses and deliver to the Marshals Service all of the paperwork necessary for the Marshals Service to effect service upon Defendants.

If the complaint is not served within 90 days after the date summonses are issued, Plaintiff should request an extension of time for service. See Meilleur v. Strong, 682 F.3d 56, 63 (2d Cir. 2012) (holding that it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to request an extension of time for service).

Plaintiff must notify the Court in writing if her address changes, and the Court may dismiss the action if Plaintiff fails to do so.

CONCLUSION The Clerk of Court is directed to mail an information package to Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is further directed to (1) issue summonses for Target Corporation, Roundel, Quinn Nelson, Allison Franklin, Lyonna Jackson, Kathleen Henry, Sidra Khan, Helen Kwon, Erin Sieling, and Kelly Roque, (2) complete the USM-285 forms with the addresses for Defendants, and (3) deliver to the U.S. Marshals Service all documents necessary to effect service.

Plaintiff may agree to accept service of documents by email, instead of regular mail, by completing the attached form, Consent to Electronic Service.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York September 20, 2024 STEWART D. AARON United States Magistrate Judge SERVICE ADDRESS FOR EACH DEFENDANT 1. Target Corporation 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403 2. Roundel 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403 3. Quinn Nelson Target Corp. / Roundel 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403 4. Allison Franklin Target Corp. / Roundel 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403 5. Lyonna Jackson Target Corp. / Roundel 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403 6. Kathleen Henry Target Corp. / Roundel 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403 7. Sidra Khan Target Corp. / Roundel 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403 8. Helen Kwon Target Corp. / Roundel 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403 9. Erin Sieling Target Corp. / Roundel 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403 10. Kelly Roque Target Corp. / Roundel 1000 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55403

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.