Herrera v. Babolat v. North America, Inc.
Herrera v. Babolat v. North America, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ee FILED: □□□□□□□□ EDERY HERRERA, ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER PERSONS SIMILARLY SITUATED, Plaintiffs, 24-cv-06119 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL BABOLAT VS NORTH AMERICA, INC., Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court has been informed by the parties that they have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 11]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by January 6, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,
356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004). SO ORDERED. / Date: December 5, 2024 MARY eh vvskocil New York, NY United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown