District Court, S.D. New York, 2024

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Prime Contractors Inc.

Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Prime Contractors Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York · Decided December 9, 2024
Trustees of the New York City District Council of Carpenters Pension Fund, Welfare Fund, Annuity Fund, Apprenticeship, Journeyman Retraining, Educational and Industry Fund v. Prime Contractors Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT D OCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT DOC #: ______ ___________ COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, DATE FILED: 12/9/2024_____ WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY CARPENTERS RELIEF AND CHARITY FUND, and THE CARPENTER CONTRACTOR ALLIANCE OF METROPOLITAN NEW YORK, Plaintiffs, -against- 23 Civ. 9033 (AT) (RFT) PRIME CONTRACTORS INC., ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND Defendant. RECOMMENDATION ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiffs filed this action against Defendants Prime Contractors Inc. (“Prime”), UTB – United Technology, Inc. (“UTB”), and QBE Insurance Corporation (“QBE”), asserting, inter alia, claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. See generally ECF No. 1. On February 9, 2024, Plaintiffs moved for a default judgment against Prime.1 See ECF Nos. 18–22. The Court referred Plaintiffs’ motion to the Honorable Robyn F.

Tarnofsky. ECF No. 50.

After careful consideration, Judge Tarnofsky issued a Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”), recommending that the Court enter a default judgment against Prime and award Plaintiffs $16,807.25 in liquidated damages, plus post-judgment interest under 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

R&R at 2, ECF No. 56. Despite receiving notification of the right to object to the R&R, no parties filed objections, and the time to do so has now passed. See R&R at 18; Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Because no objection was made, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. See Santiago v. Colvin, No. 12 Civ. 7052, 2014 WL 1092967, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 17, 2014). The Court finds no clear error in Judge Tarnofksy’s thorough and well-reasoned R&R. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Tarnofsky’s R&R in its entirety. Plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment against Prime is GRANTED. Prime must pay Plaintiffs $16,807.25 in liquidated damages, plus post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

1 Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims against UTB and QBE. ECF No. 45.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 9, 2024 New York, New York ANALISA TORRES United States District Judge

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.