A.N. v. New York City Department of Education

District Court, S.D. New York

A.N. v. New York City Department of Education

Trial Court Opinion

ELECTRONICALLY FILEI DOC #: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATE FILED: □□□□□□□□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK AWN. et al, Plaintiffs, . 1:24-cv-06431-MKV -against- NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMETN OF ORDER OF DISMISSAL EDUCATION, Defendant.

MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter filed by Defendant informing the Court that the parties have reached a settlement in principle. [ECF No. 10]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the parties are unable to memorialize their settlement in writing and as long as the application to restore the action is made by January 13, 2025. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal of the action is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,

356 F.3d 492

, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).

SO ORDERED. | i . Date: December 12, 2024 MA Ky VYSMOCIL New York, NY United States District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown