Johnson v. Fitzpatrick
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ROBERT W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff, 24-CV-9581 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Defendant.
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: In a July 10, 2020 order in Johnson v. O’Hagan Wolfe, 1:19-CV-7337 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y.), the court barred Plaintiff from filing any new civil action in this court in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without first obtaining from the court leave to file. (ECF 1:19-CV-7337, 8.)1 Plaintiff files this new pro se civil action in this court, seeks IFP status, and has not sought leave from the court to file. The Court therefore dismisses this action without prejudice for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the court’s July 10, 2020 order in Johnson, 1:19-CV-7337 (GHW) (S.D.N.Y.).
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal.
See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).
The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment in this action.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 16, 2024 New York, New York /s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
1 Plaintiff’s appeal of that order was dismissed as frivolous. Johnson v. O’Hagan Wolfe, No. 21-299 (2d Cir. July 15, 2021).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.