Building Trades Benefit Funds v. Unified Electric

District Court, E.D. New York

Building Trades Benefit Funds v. Unified Electric

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

TRUSTEES OF THE BUILDING TRADES EDUCATIONAL BENEFIT FUND, THE 23-CV-188 (ARR) (ST) BUILDING TRADES ANNUITY BENEFIT FUND, BUILDING TRADES WELFARE NOT FOR ELECTRONIC BENEFIT FUND, and THE ELECTRICIAN’S OR PRINT PUBLICATION RETIREMENT FUND, ORDER Plaintiffs,

-against-

UNIFIED ELECTRIC and KENNETH D’ ANNA, INDIVIDUALLY and KENNETH D’ ANNA d/b/a UNIFIED ELECTRIC,

Defendants.

ROSS, United States District Judge:

I have received the Report and Recommendation on the instant case dated March 14, 2024, from the Honorable Steven Tiscione, United States Magistrate Judge. See R. & R., ECF No. 24. The deadline for filing objections has passed and no objections have been filed. Accordingly, I have reviewed the Report and Recommendation for clear error on the face of the record. See Finley v. Trans Union, Experian, Equifax, No. 17-CV-371 (LDH) (LB),

2017 WL 4838764

, at *1 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 24, 2017) (quoting Est. of Ellington ex rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imps. Ltd.,

812 F. Supp. 2d 186, 189

(E.D.N.Y. 2011)). Finding no clear error, I hereby adopt the Report and Recommendation, in its entirety, as the opinion of the Court pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). Plaintiffs’ motion for default judgment is granted. The clerk of court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for plaintiffs in accordance with the Report and Recommendation. SO ORDERED.

/s/ Allyne R. Ross United States District Judge

Dated: March 29, 2024 Brooklyn, New York

Reference

Status
Unknown