Squire v. New York State
Squire v. New York State
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11:09 am, Ma y 29, 2024 EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. DISTRICT COURT ---------------------------------------------------------------X EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KASHON SQUIRE, LONG ISLAND OFFICE
Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM & ORDER -against- 24-CV-03257 (JMA) (ST)
NEW YORK STATE,
Defendant. ---------------------------------------------------------------X AZRACK, United States District Judge:
Before the Court is the application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) filed by incarcerated pro se Plaintiff Kashon Squire. (ECF No. 2.) Upon review, Plaintiff has not provided sufficient information for the Court to determine his qualification for IFP status. Plaintiff did not answer questions four, five, six, or seven on the application. (Id.) In response to question eight, Plaintiff stated that he owes “child support” but did not provide “the amounts owed and to whom they are payable.” (Id.) Accordingly, the IFP application is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renew on or before June 20, 2024, by filing a complete IFP application. Plaintiff is warned that failure to timely comply with this Order may lead to dismissal of the Complaint without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order together with a copy of Plaintiff’s IFP application (ECF No. 2) to Plaintiff at his address of record in an envelope marked “Legal Mail” and to note such mailing on the docket. The Court certifies pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum & Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. See Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). SO ORDERED. ______(_/s_/ _J_M_A__)_ ______ Joan M. Azrack
Reference
- Status
- Unknown