Vickers v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. New York

Vickers v. Commissioner of Social Security

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ________________________________________

PERRY VICKERS,

Plaintiff, v. 1:23-CV-00527

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant. ________________________________________

BRENDA K. SANNES, Chief United Sates District Judge

DECISION and ORDER Before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,006.92 and costs in the amount of $402 incurred in this appeal of the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Plaintiff’s benefits. See dkt. # 12. Plaintiff contends he is entitled to attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”),

28 U.S.C. § 2412

. He contends that he was the prevailing party, that the government’s litigation position was not substantially justified, that his net assets are worth less than $2 million, and that the case has ended with a final order. The Commissioner has no objection to Plaintiff’s request for $1,006.92 in attorney fees under the EAJA. See dkt. # 13. The Commissioner also has no objection to Plaintiff’s request for $402.00 in costs.

Id.

The Commissioner indicates: Plaintiff has not submitted an assignment of fees or requested that any awarded EAJA fees be paid to his attorney. See Docket 12. EAJA fees are “payable to the litigant and [are] subject to a Government offset to satisfy a pre-existing debt that the litigant owes the United States.” Astrue v. Ratliff,

560 U.S. 586, 589

(2010); see McAlpine v. Astrue, No. 5:10-0817,

2012 WL 5183630

, at *2 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 18, 2012) (EAJA fees are payable to the litigant, not the attorney). If, at the time of the EAJA order, Plaintiff has agreed to assign any fees to his attorney and does not owe a debt to the government that is subject to offset, the Commissioner has no objection to paying fees directly to counsel.

Id.

Because Plaintiff has not submitted an assignment of fees or requested that any awarded EAJA fees be paid to his attorney, attorney's fees will be paid directly to Plaintiff subject to any government offset. Conclusion Having examined the parties’ filings including Plaintiff's counsel’s declaration in support of the application for attorney's fees, dkt. # 12-2, the Court finds that the fees sought are recoverable and reasonable. The Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees and costs, dkt. # 12, is hereby GRANTED, as follows: 1. Attorney’s fees are awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of $1,006.92, with these fees subject to a Government offset to satisfy any pre- existing debt that the litigant might owe to the United States; 2. Costs are awarded to Plaintiff in the amount of $402. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 3, 2024

Brenda K. Sannes Chief U.S. District Judge

Reference

Status
Unknown