UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT | ater SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK fe irene as □□ Sar Gey Seat Pee i ety creer ieee eiere opi choca | EN fan DAVID ADAMES, Se ; Plaintiff, -against- 24-CV-0042 (LAK) MICHAEL EDWARD MARTIN, et ano. Defendants ee ee ee ee □□ ee eee we eee ee HX

ORDER As A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to

. The notice of removal fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails oe allege: The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Sun Printing & | Publishing Ass’n v. Edwards,

(1904); meee Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc.,

(2d Cir. 1996). | The citizenship of one or more corporations. See

(c)(1). O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 | U.S. 195 (1990). O The citizenship of one or more limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. | Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P.,

(2d Cir. 2000). | 0 The nature and citizenship of one or more business entities. Oo The timely removal of the action from state court. Absent the filing, on or before January 19, 2024 of an amended notice of removal seals alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be remanded to the state court. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 9, 2024

| Lewis lan United States Distriét Judge