Fontil v. Abrams
Fontil v. Abrams
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RAYCHEL FONTIL, Plaintiff, 23-CV-4875 (LTS) -against- BAR ORDER UNDER JUDGE RONNIE ABRAMS,
28 U.S.C. § 1651Defendant. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Plaintiff filed this action pro se. On June 14, 2023, the Court dismissed the action as frivolous. On January 2, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff, within thirty days, to show cause by declaration why an order should not be entered barring Plaintiff from filing any further documents in this action, except documents that are directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Plaintiff filed a declaration on January 10, 2024, but her arguments against imposing the bar order are insufficient. Accordingly, the bar order will issue. CONCLUSION The Court hereby bars Plaintiff from filing any further documents in this action, except documents that are directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. See
28 U.S.C. § 1651. Should Plaintiff file any motions or letters in this action, except documents directed to the Court of Appeals, the Court will not address the submissions. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate any motions in this case. The Court certifies, pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States,
369 U.S. 438, 444-45(1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: January 29, 2024 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
2
Reference
- Status
- Unknown