Tejada v. Target Corporation
Tejada v. Target Corporation
Trial Court Opinion
USDC SDNY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOCUMENT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: MARIA TEJADA, DATE FILED:_ 1/30/2024 Plaintiff, 1:23-cv-6450 (MKV) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL TARGET CORPORATION et al., Defendants.
MARY KAY VYSKOCIL, United States District Judge: The Court is in receipt of a letter from Defendant Target Corporation, writing on behalf of all counsel, informing the Court that all parties reached a settlement in principle with the assistance of the mediator [ECF No. 17]. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court’s calendar if the application to restore the action is made by March 29, 2024. If no such application is made by that date, today’s dismissal is with prejudice. See Muze, Inc. v. Digital On Demand, Inc.,
356 F.3d 492, 494 n.1 (2d Cir. 2004).
SO ORDERED. | i / ln Date: January 30, 2024 MARY(IAY : rho i New York, NY United States District Judge
Reference
- Status
- Unknown