Perez v. Ocasio Ruiz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT : SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Is ee wee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee eX uf { = RENELIO PEREZ, et ano., [pars tae □ Plaintiffs, , -against- 24-cv-1006 (LAK) RA..L ALEJANDRO OCASIO RUIZ (../k/a RAUW ALEJANDRO), et al., Defendants ree er ee ee ee ew eB ee □□ eee ee eee et HX ORDER LEwIis A. KAPLAN, District Judge.

Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint fails adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: The nationality and citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, e.g., Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain, 490 U.S. 826, 828 (1989); Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged ae Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1).

O The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990).

The exact nature and citizenship of one or more alleged limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000).

Absent the filing, on or before March 4, 2024 of an amended ae adequately alleging the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 21, 2024 Lewis A. Kaplan United States District Judge